W7.
shared not subasibe to the doctrine that
any man cared claim an
acting appontinent.
سل
a
right.
any system
neust
of course
h
applied witte intelligen
& discriuumation,
newly appointed Asst Col. Seint
shemed noth
6.9.
a
of shat service
appointed to act as
there une
found § Fürst Clas
Col. See when,
Offices
Se
that
available; but I don't
tterie cam
lam an
doubl
that generally speaking, his view
is correct.
? Reply.
that, as
heis
aware. Ou pasa 7). the view always
taken 4 the 3 gs
५
is
that facting
apfoto
سا
to use puñaich
matter
a
for sale the form
umpossible
16
exox & that it is
sat 4
свай
CAN
recognize and
the part gar ficar
to aut in
post orter then his own. Ibak,
Sembratty That' the
desire to fatter
W
this matter
the
sys
for's
dens not
discreti
that he dons
not consider that am definite
miles ought to her or can be laid
the select in
of Mice
for
مسلم
Suggestio
down but that
form that
in
service
that he
agrees
witte the
cères it
199
in ordinay
the interacts of the public
that the bead slips of
dept in
the absence of the
a
Substantin holder showed h. held
ん
an
officer who has expectance.
gthe work
a that the
which the abuse
officer
of a single
disorgainings several depito
the resulting
م اسلام کا
That therefre
thal
shared cam
be cours in the
a
general whe
the Assistant said act as
head lub
lub that
will lo nece
dickin
necessar
of course
il.
to exercise.
same discriminatin
in applying this principle
and probably b. undesirable to
appant a junior offic
junior officer who had
only recenth
her app assistant-
to act as head.
Hong Kong of cause
de
deffes widely from
7.ws, going
the straits 87.4s,
to the
Smallners of the service. This results? in almost everybody bing a specialist;
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.